LEHIGH UNIVERSITY DEFINITION OF HAZING:
“Hazing is any action taken or situation created, whether on or off campus, to produce mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, harassment, or ridicule. Hazing includes but is not limited to any brutality of a physical nature, such as paddling, whipping, beating, branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to the elements, forced consumption of any food, liquor, drug or other substance, or any other forced physical activity that would subject the individual to physical harm or mental stress, such as sleep deprivation, forced exclusion from social contact, forced conduct which could result in extreme embarrassment, or any other forced activity which would adversely affect the mental health or dignity of the individual. Among prohibited activities are forced or coerced activities which create excessive fatigue; cause physical and psychological shocks; involve kidnapping; involve morally questionable quests, treasure hunts, scavenger hunts, or any other such activities; involve publicly wearing apparel that is conspicuous and not normally in good taste; cause students to engage in public stunts and buffoonery, morally degrading or humiliating games and activities, or late night activities which interfere with scholastic activities. Also prohibited are any activities that are in violation of federal, state, or local laws, this Code of Conduct, or accepted standards of good taste or propriety. For purposes of this definition, any activity described in this paragraph upon which the admission into or affiliation with an organization is directly or indirectly conditioned shall be presumed to be “forced or coerced” activity, the willingness of an individual to participate in such activity notwithstanding.” (Lehigh University Student Handbook)
Learn more about hazing bystander intervention:
The Hidden Harms
Have you considered the psychological effects of hazing — the hidden harms?
You are on Facebook and see some of your teammates’ posts about upcoming “initiation” for this year’s freshmen, as well as pictures from last year. You know it’s actually hazing and you’re not comfortable with what they are planning.
It seems that they push the limit a little more every year but they justify it by saying it’s what makes the team close and that it’s “tradition.” You want to say something but feel intimidated and don’t want them to think less of you. What do you do?
- How many would now consider a team activity, by definition, hazing?
- How could you break a long-standing “tradition”? What activities could be introduced to start a new tradition and replace a questionable one?
- How do hazing activities get passed on? Have you been hazed? If yes, do you think it means you are permitted to pass it on to the next class? Is there an expectation to participate?
- How could the competitive or risk taking nature of being a student-athlete impact a hazing situation (alcohol consumption, water chugging, high risk activities AFTER alcohol consumption)?
- Does your team have a unique culture? If yes, what is it? How does hazing fit into that?
Team building/initiation “type” activities can be a good thing and very beneficial. They should be serious and challenging, help the person find an identity in a group of athletes and give them a sense of belonging. These types of activities, however, are different from hazing in very fundamental ways. Without careful consideration, they can too often degenerate into hazing where they humiliate, embarrass, degrade or endanger people. Ask yourself:
- Is there secrecy around the activity?
- Is there pressure to participate?
- Is a specific group or individual singled out?
- Do members justify it as being a “tradition”?
- Does this activity promote and conform to the ideals and values of the team/athletic department/university?
- Will this activity increase long term feelings of friendship between new and initiated members of the team?
- Take the perspective of your parents – would they be proud? Your Coach? Athletic Director? The University President?
- Would you be willing to defend the merit of this activity in a court of law?
- Does the activity meet both the spirit and letter of the standards prohibiting hazing?
How Hazing Is Justified
Moral Disengagement (Bandura, 2002): Gradual disengagement of moral self-sanction. Behavior normally viewed as immoral, even reprehensible, over time becomes more benign, acceptable or worthy in a particular social setting through cognitive restructuring.
- Moral Justification – make it socially worthy (e.g., creating bonds, building unity).
- Euphemistic labeling – sanitized language of non-responsibility (e.g., “team building”).
- Advantageous comparison – War analogy – “We’re going to battle.”
- Displacement of responsibility – “We’re just carrying on tradition”; surreptitious sanctioning (wink and nod); intentionally uninformed – “We don’t have a problem with hazing here,” or “I don’t want to know.”
- Diffusion of Responsibility – Normative conformity; avoidance of personal responsibility.
- Disregard/distortion of consequences – Athletes are good at hiding pain, physical, emotional, or otherwise.
- Dehumanization – Perception of freshmen as “less than”; use of masks, costumes, etc.
- Attribution of Blame – Blame the victim – “They agreed to it.”
Did you know…?
- Student-athletes have been dismissed and teams have been dropped because of hazing incidents. Is it really worth it?
- Survey results state 76% of Lehigh University students believe hazing is not an effective way to initiate new members into an organizations. (Hazing Assessment Perceptions Survey, 2012)
- 93% of Lehigh students believe they do not need to be hazed in order to feel like they belong to a group. (Hazing Assessment Perceptions Survey, 2012)
- Define up front what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.
- Ensure the activity that is planned could not be considered, by definition, hazing.
- Don’t let others justify hazing as “tradition”.
- BREAK THE SILENCE and voice your opinion.
- Choose to not participate.
- Speak with teammates/captains about your concerns.
- Talk to an administrator/coach/trainer, etc.
- Come up with new activities that promote team bonding without any risk of it being considered hazing.
- Get those involved to stop and think about the people they are hazing (perspective taking). Is there any chance hazing could trigger something in terms of personal/ emotional challenges they have had to face in their life?
- Lehigh University Hazing Prevention
- Lehigh University Myths vs. Reality
- Lehigh University Hazing Campus Assessment 2012
- Lehigh University Hazing Infographic
- Lehigh University Hazing & Student-Athletes Infographic
- Lehigh University Hazing & Fraternity & Sorority Life Infographic
- 9-1-1 or Campus Police
- Campus Hazing hotline
- Dean of Students
- Coach, Assistant Coach, Athletic Directors, Administrators, Advisors, and/or Trainers
- NCAA Handbook – Building New Traditions – Hazing Prevention in College Athletics –www.ncaa.org/health-safety
- A Comprehensive Approach to Hazing – www.hazingprevention.org
- Stop Hazing – www.stophazing.org
- The Gordie Foundation
- Haze The Movie – www.hazethemovie.com
- Hazing Prevention – www.nhpw.com
- Alfred University Sports Hazing Site – www.alfred.edu/sports_hazing
- A Community Unconquered by Hazing – http://hazing.fsu.edu
- Preventing Hazing at Cornell – www.hazing.cornell.edu
- Preventing Hazing at Harvard – www.hazing.college.harvard.edu
- Hazing in View — College Students at Risk –www.stophazing.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hazing_in_view_web1.pdf